Google-China search engine dispute relates to China’s internet filtering censorship regime. First, GATS is applicable to China’s measures. Second, search engine belongs to Provisional CPC844 “data base service” and China didn’t make commitments under that sector, therefore, China doesn’t have the obligations of market access or national treatment. Third, the possible argument by U.S. is article 3 of GATS, i.e., transparency. Last, even if the Panel regards search engine as the sector under which China has made commitments, China could incite article 14 of GATS. Generally speaking, U.S. doesn’t have strong arguments to raise a WTO case against China.