李晓玲:中国青年政治学院法学院副教授,法学博士。研究方向:国际经济法、世界贸易组织法。
D996.1/F746.18
WTO成立后,数起WTO争端的专家组阐述了判断GATS下服务和服务提供者“同类性”的根据,但尚未形成成熟法理。在同类服务的判定上,欧共体香蕉III案专家组依据服务的性质和特性,而中国电子支付服务案专家组引入了竞争条件标准。在同类服务提供者的判定上,欧共体香蕉III案和加拿大汽车案专家组依据所提供服务是同类服务,中国出版物和音像制品案专家组依据差别待遇是否仅以来源地为基础,中国电子支付服务案则似乎引入了竞争标准。迄今,上诉机构尚未有机会考虑这一重要的法律问题。本文将分析和比较各案,探讨GATS下“同类性”法理的发展、存在的矛盾和待解决的问题。
Since the inception of the WTO, the “likeness” of services and service suppliers under the GATS has been addressed by several WTO panels, but has not yet been developed into mature jurisprudence. As to “like services”, the criterion relied on by the panel of EC – Bananas III is the nature and characteristics of the services, while in China – EPS, the panel focused on competitive terms. The criterion for “like service suppliers” also varies from whether they supply like services in EC – Bananas III and Canada – Autos, to whether different treatments are solely based on the origin of suppliers. Notably, it seems that the panel of China – EPS also applied the competitive approach in deciding the likeness of service suppliers. So far, the appellate body has not yet had the opportunity to address this important legal concept. This thesis aims to probe the development of relevant jurisprudence on “likeness” under the GATS, the inconsistencies thereof and the issues unresolved as well.
李晓玲. GATS下服务与服务提供者的“同类性”研究*[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2014,(4):5-15.
复制