姜作利:山东大学法学院教授,法学博士,博士生导师。研究方向:WTO法及国际经济法。
D996.1
WTO专家组和上诉机构在审理错综复杂的案件中频繁运用“问题回避技法”,既能维持适当的政治-司法平衡,有助于保障WTO的正常运行,又可以坚持经济效率原则,有利于保证专家组和上诉机构按照DSU规定完成其迅速有效解决WTO争端的职能。但这些“问题回避技法”主要源于西方法理及司法实践,我国参诉人员对此了解不多,难以应对,增加了我国在WTO诉讼活动中胜诉的难度。因此,我国在参诉中,首先要正确理解“规则取向”和“问题回避技法”之间的关系;其次,要加大对西方相关法理、司法实践及WTO案件的研究,提高应对技巧;对那些使用频率低、主要涉及程序问题的技法也要做好预防工作。同时,要善于运用WTO为发展中国家提供的特殊差别待遇,据理力争,切实维护我国的合法权益。
In hearing difficult and complex cases, the WTO Panel and Appellate Body often use “Problem-avoiding Techniques” which can keep an appropriate political and judicial balance for the normal operation of the WTO, also adhere to the principle of economic efficiency and are helpful to assure that the Panel and Appellate Body fulfill their function by DSU to settle disputes promptly and effectively. However, as these techniques are originated from the western jurisprudence and judicial practices about which Chinese lawyers know little, the application of them may make it difficult for the Chinese lawyers to win the cases. Therefore, Chinese lawyers should first understand correctly the relationship between the “rule-orientation” and “Problem-avoiding Techniques” , then, they should make detailed research on the relevant western jurisprudence, judicial practices and the WTO cases and improve the countermeasure techniques, and at the same time, get well-prepared for the techniques used less frequently and relating mainly procedures. In addition, China should learn to make full use of the special and different treatment for the developing countries for the protection of China’s legal interests
姜作利.评WTO争端解决机构的“问题回避技法”及我国对策*[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2014,(5):13-24.
复制