贺艳:西安交通大学法学院讲师,法律治理学在读博士。研究方向:国际经济法、国际贸易法。
DF961
近年来,美国在一系列对华双反调查中反复认定中国国有企业为“公共机构”,使中国面临更加严峻的反补贴局势。虽然WTO上诉机构在DS379案中确立了认定“公共机构”的新标准,支持了中方主张的“政府职能论”,但美国在执行该裁决时却采取了有意拖延和规避执行等手段,最终认定有关国有企业仍为“公共机构”。为有效保障胜诉果实,有必要深入研究美国执行WTO贸易救济案件裁决的程序规则及其在DS379案中执行“公共机构”裁决的具体做法,并思考应对之策。
In recent years, The United States has repeatedly identified Chinese State-owned Enterprises as “public body”, which made the countervailing situation that China is facing with even worse. Although the Appellate Body in the DS379 established a new standard in order to identify what is “public body”, having supported China’s position of “governmental authority”, the US implemented the decision through the means of conscious delay and circumvention of the implementation, and finally US decided that the related State-owned Enterprises are still “public body”. In order to effectively guarantee the favorable result for China, it is necessary to carefully study the rules of US implementing the WTO Rulings in trade remedy cases, as well as the concrete practices of US implementing the WTO public body decision, so as to consider the further countermeasures.
贺艳.美国执行WTO贸易救济案件裁决的规则与实践——以DS379案“公共机构”裁决的执行为视角[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2015,(5):56-67.
复制