As an important participant in international rule making, China has concluded some Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) which include WTO-plus and WTO-extra provisions with its trading partners. These FTAs with WTO-plus and WTO-extra provisions are called the “new generation of Chinese FTAs”. The emergence and increasing number of these WTO-plus and WTO-extra provisions have raised many concerns among the world. For instance, some WTO-plus provisions in the field of intellectual property may have negative effects on the protection of public health. Before we move on to the discussion of the negative effects these provisions may bring about, we can analyze their legal enforceability. In order to be a legally enforceable treaty provision, it usually needs to pass both substantive test and procedural test, i.e., there should be binding term and clearly defined right and/or obligation in this provision in terms of substantive standard, and this provision should be subject to dispute settlement mechanism in terms of procedural standard. In the new generation of Chinese FTAs, there are WTO-plus provisions in the areas of trade in goods, trade in service and intellectual property. Some of these WTO-plus provisions are not legally enforceable due to not passing the substantive test while others are due to not passing the procedural test. Since many WTO-plus provisions(especially those provisions in sensitive fields)are not legally enforceable, we do not need to over-worry about the negative effects they may bring about. When implementing some controversial and legally enforceable WTO-plus rules, China should be careful not to violate its WTO obligations and other international obligations.