孟琪:复旦大学国际法博士,华东政法大学国际法博士后,香港城市大学法学院访问学者(2013~2014年),上海第二工业大学副教授。研究方向:WTO争端解决机制研究。
F743/DF961
本文受2017年度教育部人文社会科学研究- -般项目“WTO裁决执行的法律机理及中国实践研究”(项目编号:17YJC820036)、2017年度中国博士后科学基金( 第62批) ( 项目编号: 2017M621420) 、2018年度中国一上海合作组织国际司法交流合作培训基地研究基金项目“构建上海合作组织争端解决机制研究”( 项目编号: 18SHJD018 )的资助和支持。
上海合作组织自成立起即受到了国内外的高度关注,但在经贸争端解决机制方面仍存在法律制度模糊乃至空白状态,这可能导致未来区域经贸合作的进一步发展面临挑战。本文在分析构建上合组织经贸争端解决机制可行性和必要性的基础上,通过该组织相关国家利用WTO争端解决机制解决经贸争端的数据统计分析和实证研究,认为现阶段WTO争端解决机制作为上合组织相关国家间经贸争端解决机制具有可行性,而且是目前的最佳选择,对此,中国应该积极推动引入。
Since its establishment, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) has attracted wide attentionboth at home and abroad. However, the vague or even blank of legal system in the economic and trade disputesettlement mechanism will lead to challenges for the further development of regional economic and tradecooperation in the future. Based on the analysis of the feasibility and necessity of establishing the economic andtrade dispute settlement mechanism of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, through theoretical analysis andempirical research on the feasibility of using the WTO dispute settlement mechanism by the relevant countriesof the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and by means of statistical analysis of data. This paper puts forwardthe viewpoint that WTO disputes settlement mechanism is feasible as an economic and trade dispute settlementmechanism among the relevant SCO countries, and the WTO dispute settlement mechanism is the first choiceand the best choice at present.
孟琪. WTO争端解决机制作为“上海合作组织”经贸争端解决机制的可行性研究*[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2019,(3):43-57.
复制