季若望:浙江工商大学法学院讲师,法学博士。研究方向:侵权法、合同法、比较法。
D90-05
本文受教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“‘ 全有或全无’赔偿责任体系的挑战:比例侵权责任研究”(项目编号: 19YJC820017 )资助。
人工智能的全面崛起对传统的法律职业、责任主体、因果关系等各方面产生了巨大的挑战,进而引发了令人瞩目的“法律死亡论”。然而,弱人工智能缺乏“意志能力”,无法被视为法律主体看待。而深度学习基础所依赖的相关关系的探寻亦无法替代事实因果关系和法律因果关系的重要作用,无法动摇传统法律体系的根基。因此,人工智能技术的定位始终在于“辅助”和“完善”,而非“主导”和“替代”。借助人工智能,传统法律职业中大量低效工作所消耗的生命力将得到解放,法律中的因果关系、“理性人”模型等传统体系要件将进一步实现精细化。同时,法律也会借由人工智能之手完善相对的公平化。法律并不会在人工智能技术的刺激下经历“死亡”,反而会借助智能时代完成自我革新,是为“法律的再生”。
The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence has brought huge challenges to the traditional legalprofession, subject of liability, causation and other aspects, which has caused the remarkable "law death theory".However, Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI) lacks "awareness" and cannot be regarded as a legal subject. Andthe exploration of correlativity based on deep learning cannot replace the important role of F actual Causationand Legal Causation, and cannot shake the foundation of the traditional legal system. Therefore, the functionof Artificial Intelligence technology is always "assistance" and "perfection", rather than "dominance" and"substitution". With the help of Artificial Intelligence, the vitality consumed by traditional legal professions dueto a large number of inefficient work will be liberated, and the traditional system elements such as causation inlaw and the "rational person" model will be further refined. At the same time, the law will also improve relativefairness through the use of Artificial Intelligence. Instead of experiencing "death" under the stimulation ofArtificial Intelligence technology, law will complete self- renovation, which is so-called "regeneration of law".
季若望.法律的再生:人工智能时代的凤凰涅槃*[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2020,(4):111-124.
复制