D801
本文受中国国际经济交流中心上海分中心2018年委托项目和2020年上海市浦江人才项目(项目编号:2020PJC090)资助。
“长臂管辖”不仅是美国对外司法霸凌主义的体现,也是冷战后美国全球霸权的重要组成部分。尽管它通过复杂的制度设计披上了貌似“人道”与“合法”的外衣,但本质上仍是以非战争性的“胁迫”手段迫使或威慑其他国家遵照美国的规则和利益行事。强大的金融和军事霸权、遍布全球的情报网络、领先各国的司法能力及其战略传播能力共同构成了美国“长臂管辖”的根基。在国际政治中,超越民族国家主权的“长臂管辖”行为在理论、道德和实践等层面都存在着很大争议。随着特朗普政府将中国定义为“战略竞争对手”,美国对华“长臂管辖”政策已越来越政治化。面对美国“长臂管辖”政策的新变化,需要从不同角度重新审视这一政策,并积极应对其可能带来的潜在后果。
As an important part of the U.S. global hegemony after the Cold War, Long arm jurisdiction is a kind of superpower’s judicial bullying to the rest of the world. Although it looks like humane and legal due to the complex system design, yet it is a kind of coercion policy essentially, with the purpose to force or deter other countries to act in accordance with the rules and interests of the United States. The Long arm jurisdiction policy of U.S. is based on its super-capability in financial, intelligence, military, technology, judicial and allied systems. In contemporary international politics, the behavior of long arm jurisdiction that transcends the sovereignty of nation-states is highly controversial at the theoretical, moral, and practical levels. After the Trump administration defines China as a "strategic competitor", the US policy of long arm jurisdiction towards China has become politicized and radicalized gradually. In the context of new Sino-American relationship, we may need to re-think the U.S. long arm jurisdiction policy from a different perspective and respond to its potential consequences actively.
王震.对新形势下美国对华“长臂管辖”政策的再认识*[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2020,(6):91-104.
复制