刘晓豹:对外经济贸易大学法学院国际法博士研究生,内蒙古农业大学人文社会科学学院讲师。研究方向:国际法、国际环境法。
DF969/F744
内蒙古自治区高等学校科学技术研究项目“碳达峰背景下企业环境合规问题研究”(项目编号:NJSY22525);内蒙古高校创新团队发展计划“内蒙古草原生态安全保障能力研究创新团队”(项目编号:NMGIRT2218)的共同资助
为加速实现《欧洲绿色协议》愿景,欧盟委员会推出碳边境调整机制,要求进口商在进口时进行申报,超出欧盟碳排放标准的产品需购买许可以抵消超额的碳排放。目前公布的碳边境调整机制方案对来自非欧盟成员国的产品实施,构成针对同类产品的歧视,违反了国民待遇原则和最惠国待遇原则。但碳边境调整机制的实施可以起到保护人类或动植物生命安全以及可用竭的自然资源的作用,并且不构成武断的歧视,不会变相限制国际贸易,进而欧盟可以援引环境例外条款来主张碳边境调整机制与 WTO 的合规性。在此背景下,我国应坚持维护多边主义,强化国际合作,通过完善碳交易制度,发展低碳技术,强化诉讼能力等来应对欧盟碳边境调整机制可能带来的影响。
To promote the realization of EU Green Deal, the European Council initiated the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, which laid restrictions for importers to declare the carbon emission of the goods so as to purchase certificate for the extra carbon emission pursuant to EU regulations. With respect to the current version of Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, it constitutes discrimination against like product from non-EU member countries, thus violating national treatment and most favored nation treatment. However, Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism can protect the security of lives of human, animals and plants as well as exhaustible natural resources. It does not constitute arbitral discrimination and disguised restriction on international trade. Consequently, EU could resort to environment exceptions to justify Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Under such a circumstance, China should stick to multilateralism, improve the carbon emission trading system, develop low-carbon technology and enhance the ability to relevant lawsuits.
刘晓豹.欧盟碳边境调整机制的WTO合规性问题分析*[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2022,(5):5-22.
复制