赵青:同济大学法学院助理教授,法学博士。研究方向:国际法。
D996.9/DF969
20 世纪 90 年代以来,以美国和欧盟为代表,国家将国内法中的渔业资源养护措施适用于领海、毗连区、专属经济区和大陆架之外的公海。在这一背景下,公海船旗国专属管辖原则在渔业领域受到冲击,国家可以根据国际习惯法或国际条约的规定,使本国渔业资源养护措施具有域外效力,并通过行政执法和司法措施域外适用其国内渔业资源养护措施。我国是公海渔业强国,他国渔业资源养护措施域外适用将严重影响我国公海渔业产业升级进程。明确国家域外适用国内渔业养护措施的法律界限,拒绝域外适用滥用,利用国际法和域外适用国国内法对外国管辖的我国渔船进行救济,对我国渔业的长期稳定发展至关重要。
Since the 1990s, states, such as the United States and the members of the European Union, have applied the conservation measures in their domestic laws out of the territorial sea, the contiguous zone, and the exclusive economic zone. In this context, the principle of exclusive jurisdiction of flag states on the high seas has been impacted in the field of fisheries. Domestic conservation measures may have extraterritorial effect in accordance with customary international law or international treaties, and may be enforced extraterritorially through administrative enforcement and judicial measures. China is a strong country on the high seas fishing, and the extraterritorial application of conservation measures by other states will seriously affect the upgrading process of China's high seas fishery industry. Clarifying the legal boundaries of the country's extraterritorial application of domestic conservation measures, rejecting the abuse of extraterritorial application, and using international law and the domestic law of the extraterritorial applicable country to provide relief to Chinese fishing vessels under foreign jurisdiction are vital to the long-term stable development of China’s fishery industry.
赵青.渔业资源养护措施的域外适用及我国因应[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2022,(5):52-69.
复制