李坤海:南京工业大学法政学院讲师,法学博士。研究方向:国际法。
D993.5
本文受国家社科基金项目“拜登上任以来中美碳外交关系的非线性变化和应对”(项目编号:21BGJ054)的资助
南极海洋生物资源是南极资源纷争的重点。为实现对南极海洋生物资源的占有,部分国家单方主张在南极海域享有专属经济区。结合南极陆海相间的特殊地理,主张海域包括两类:其一为从南极洲大陆附近划定专属经济区;其二为亚南极区岛屿专属经济区延伸至南极海域的区域。根据南极主权冻结及专属经济区的构成要件,这些国家的主张都不具有法理基础,在适用上也面临多重法律挑战,且没有得到其他国家承认。我国不是南极主权的声索国,且坚定地维护《南极条约》,维护南极主权冻结。对于南极海洋生物资源,应坚持“全人类利益”立场,反对专属经济区在南极海域适用的主张。同时,我国应尊重南极治理的自主性,在维护 CCAMLR 的集体管辖下,推进南极海洋生物资源治理的共商共建共享。
Antarctic marine living resources are one of the key points of Antarctic resource disputes. In order to realize the occupation of Antarctic marine living resources, combined with the special geography of Antarctica’s distribution of land and sea, some countries unilaterally advocate Exclusive Economic Zones in Antarctic Ocean, including two categories: One is to delimit Exclusive Economic Zones near the continent of Antarctica. The second is the area where the Exclusive Economic Zone of the sub-Antarctic islands extends to the Antarctic sea. According to the Antarctic sovereignty frozen principle and the constituent elements of the Exclusive Economic Zone, these countries’ claims do not have a legal basis, face multiple legal challenges in their application, and are not recognized by other countries. China is a non-claimant state in Antarctica, and firmly upholds the Antarctic Treaty and the Antarctic sovereignty frozen principle. With regard to Antarctic marine living resources, attention should be paid to the possession intentions of some countries, and the position of “the interests of all mankind” should be adhered to, and the idea of the application of the Exclusive Economic Zone in Antarctic ocean should be opposed. At the same time, China should respect the self-regime of Antarctic governance, and promote consultation, co-construction and sharing of Antarctic marine living resources governance under the collective jurisdiction of CCAMLR.
李坤海.论专属经济区在南极海域的不适用性*[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2023,(5):80-91.
复制