徐梅:西北政法大学经济学院教授,经济学博士。研究方向:数量经济学。
F8/F27
本文为陕西省科技厅项目《陕西省支持科技创新型政府引导基金的运作机制与绩效研究》(项目编号:2021JM-454)阶段性成果
本文通过筛选出科创板的 573 家科技型企业,并选取了 2011~2021 年的企业财务、政府引导基金投资、宏观经济等数据,运用固定效应模型和多期 DID 模型,不仅对融资约束的中介效应进行了分析,还比较了财政协同金融两种模式对处不同成长时期企业和不同地区企业技术创新的促进效果。研究结果表明,财政协同金融的信贷模式和投资模式通过缓解融资约束促进了企业技术创新。投资模式对促进处于成长初期的企业创新效果更好,信贷模式对促进处于成长稳定期的企业创新效果更好。投资模式和信贷模式对东部地区的企业创新都有显著促进作用,中部地区更多依赖于投资模式, 西部地区则更多依赖于信贷模式。为此,一方面应提高财政协同金融两种模式的相互配合;另一方面,西部地区应发展完善科技金融服务体系,提升投资模式的促进作用。
This paper selects 573 technology-based enterprises on the Science and Technology Innovation Board, and selects corporate finance, government-guided fund investment, macroeconomic and other data from 2011 to 2021. By using fixed effect model and multi-period DID model, this paper not only analyzes the intermediary effect of financing constraints, but also compares the effect of the two modes of fiscal cooperation on the innovation output of enterprises in different growth periods and in different regions. The results show that the credit model and investment model of fiscal cooperative finance promote the innovation output of enterprises by easing financing constraints. The investment model has better effect on promoting the innovation of enterprises in the early stage of growth, and the credit model has better effect on promoting the innovation of enterprises in the stable stage of growth. Both the investment model and the credit model significantly promote the innovation of enterprises in the eastern region. The central region depends more on the investment model, while the western region depends more on the credit model. On the one hand, improve the mutual cooperation between the two modes of fiscal coordination and finance, on the other hand, the western region should develop and improve the scientific and technological financial service system, and enhance the promotion role of investment mode.
徐梅.财政协同金融促进企业科技创新模式的效果差异研究*[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2023,(6):35-49.
复制