1.华东政法大学国际金融法律学院,上海 201620 ;2.华东政法大学国际法学院,上海 201620
贺小勇:华东政法大学国际金融法律学院教授,博士生导师。研究方向:国际经济法。
刘真宇:华东政法大学国际法学院博士研究生。研究方向:国际经济法。
D996
本文受国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国特色自由贸易港国际法治研究”(项目编号:20&ZD205)的资助。① 在源代码条款视阈下,本文将聚焦于源代码的保护和监管问题,而不对算法的保护和监管问题展开重点研究
1.International School of Law and Finance, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620 , China ; 2.School ofInternational Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620 , China
人工智能技术的发展在为国家带来核心竞争力的同时,也引发了诸多治理难题。源代码是人工智能软件的关键要素,其保护和监管问题受到广泛关注。然而,各方尚未在 WTO 电子商务谈判中就源代码的保护和监管达成一致,双边及区域经贸协定中的源代码条款呈现碎片化特征,其中尤以源代码监管层面的差异最为突出。在此情况下,WTO 例外条款被探索性地用作缓解源代码监管困境的手段。 但经比对分析其适用范围、所列目标及必要性测试后发现,其适用存在较大局限性。当前,中国人工智能实力水平和市场规模位居全球前列,但源代码条款的谈判与制定却相对滞后。中国应将上述困境转化为明确自身源代码条款发展策略的机遇,在现行源代码条款的基础上构建“保护—监管— 平衡”三层结构的中国特色源代码条款,在保护软件源代码知识产权和商业秘密属性的同时,更好地回应国家对人工智能等软件的监管需求,并以比例原则协调保护和监管问题以推动凝聚共识,进而在 WTO 电子商务谈判、双边及区域经贸协定制定与升级中积极推广中式源代码条款。
The development of artificial intelligence technology has brought core competitiveness to the nation while also presenting numerous governance challenges. Source code, as a critical component of AI software, has drawn widespread attention regarding its protection and regulation. However, in WTO E-Commerce Negotiations, parties have yet to reach consensus on the protection and regulation of software source code. Source code clauses in bilateral and regional economic and trade agreements exhibit fragmented characteristics, with disparities in source code regulation being particularly pronounced. In this context, WTO exception clauses have been explored as a potential solution to alleviate source code regulatory dilemmas. However, comparative analysis of their applied scope, stated objectives, and the “necessity test” reveals significant limitations in their applicability. Currently, China ranks among the world’s leaders in AI capabilities and market size, yet negotiations and formulation of source code clauses lag behind. China should transform these challenges into an opportunity to define its own source code clause development strategy. Building upon existing clauses, China could establish a three-tiered “protection-regulation-balance” framework for its source code clauses with Chinese characteristics. This approach would safeguard the intellectual property rights and trade secret attributes of software source code while better addressing national regulatory needs for software like AI. By applying the principle of proportionality to coordinate protection and regulation, China could foster consensus. This framework should be actively promoted in WTO E-Commerce Negotiations, and the formulation and upgrading of bilateral and regional economic and trade agreements.
贺小勇,刘真宇.源代码条款的碎片化困境及中国因应[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2026,33(1):82-97.
复制
