1. 南京大学商学院, 南京 210093 ; 2. 南京审计大学统计与数据科学学院, 南京 211815
华笑烨:南京大学商学院博士研究生。研究方向:开放型经济理论与实践。
戴翔:南京审计大学统计与数据科学学院教授,博士生导师。研究方向:开放型经济理论与实践。
F125/F273.1
本文受江苏省社会科学基金项目 “‘制度—政策—生态’ 三元视角下政府协同治理影响江苏民营企业创新的机制、效应与路径研究”(项目编号: 25ZHB007)资助
1. School of Business, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093 , China ; 2. School of Statistics and Data Science, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211815 , China
在向制度型开放转变的更高水平对外开放新阶段,如何通过制度创新释放双循环战略的创新红利,是实现高质量发展的重要议题。本文从国内制度创新与国际自由贸易协定(FTA)网络嵌入协同的视角,对省域层面制度型开放水平进行测度,并基于2013~2022年A股上市公司数据,系统考察制度型开放如何赋能双循环促进企业创新。研究发现:国内经济循环和国际经济循环均显著促进企业创新,且二者交互产生协同效应;制度型开放能够显著强化双循环对企业创新的促进作用,且这一结论在经过系列稳健性检验后依然成立。机制检验表明,制度型开放赋能双循环促进企业创新主要通过三条路径实现:一是强化经济集聚,放大双循环下的知识溢出与要素共享效应;二是缓解融资约束,为企业的创新活动提供稳定的资金保障;三是驱动数字化转型,拓展企业创新的技术边界与可能性空间。异质性分析发现,这一赋能效应在低市场分割地区、高技术行业及董事具有海外背景的企业中更为突出。本文突破了传统研究将制度型开放视为单一外部环境的局限,揭示了其作为“循环放大器”和“创新催化剂”的双重功能。我国应依托“双循环”新发展格局,集聚高端创新资源以突破价值链低端锁定,通过深化制度型开放对接国际高标准规则、释放制度红利提升国际制度话语权,从而持续赋能企业创新能力与发展韧性提升。
In the new phase of higher-level opening-up transitioning to institutional openness, how to leverage institutional innovation to unlock the innovation dividends of the dual-circulation strategy has become a critical issue for achieving high-quality development. This study innovatively measures institutional openness levels through the synergy of domestic institutional innovation and international free trade agreement network integration. Based on A-share listed company data from 2013 to 2022, we systematically examine the empowering effects and mechanisms of institutional openness on corporate innovation. Findings reveal that institutional openness significantly enhances the dual-circulation strategy’s promotion of corporate innovation, a conclusion that remains robust after rigorous tests. Mechanistic analysis indicates three primary pathways: (1) Strengthening economic agglomeration to amplify knowledge spillovers and factor sharing effects under dual-circulation; (2) Alleviating financing constraints to provide stable funding for innovation activities; (3) Driving digital transformation to expand technological boundaries and innovation possibilities. Heterogeneity analysis highlights that this empowering effect is more pronounced in regions with low market segmentation, high-tech industries, enterprises with internationalized governance structures. Breaking away from traditional perspectives that view institutional openness as a single external factor, this study demonstrates its dual functions as a “circular amplifier” and “innovation catalyst”. China should leverage the new dual-circulation development paradigm to pool high-end innovation resources and break free from being locked into the lower end of the value chain. By deepening institutional opening-up to align with international high-standard rules, China can unlock institutional dividends and enhance its influence in international institutional discourse, thereby continuously improving the innovation capabilities and development resilience of enterprises.
华笑烨,戴翔.制度型开放赋能双循环促进企业创新研究[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2026,33(4):20-36.
复制
