北京师范大学法学院, 北京 100875
覃璐怡:北京师范大学法学院博士研究生。研究方向:国际法。
D99/D922.13
本文受国家社会科学基金重点项目“构建‘内外统筹公私合作’的《反外国制裁法》实施机制研究”(项目编号:22AFX025)的资助
School of Law, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875 , China
《出口管制条例》第49条规定确立了“裁量性”域外适用机制, 商务主管部门依法决定管制的启动、适用范围与管制程度。该项权力的行使具有行政监管属性, 应以维护国家安全和利益、履行防扩散等国际义务为目的, 并受比例原则与正当程序的约束。裁量权的行使还须建立在对技术来源、受控物项成分及主体关联等事实的查明基础上。实践中, 境外核查手段不足、认定标准不明与执法资源有限等因素制约了相关事实的查明, 增加了许可审查和企业合规的负担。基于此, 裁量性域外适用机制的完善应当在保留必要裁量空间的同时, 明确启动条件, 确立风险分级标准, 合理配置行政机关的调查责任和经营者的材料提供义务, 健全相应的豁免、复核与救济机制, 使管制范围与实际风险、执行能力相适应, 并将相关决定置于必要的程序约束和事后审查之下。
Article 49 of the Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Export Control of Dual-Use Items establishes a framework for "discretionary extraterritorial application", under which the competent commerce authority determines, in accordance with law, whether to impose controls, their scope, and the degree of restriction. This power is administrative and regulatory in nature. Its exercise must serve the purposes of safeguarding national security and interests and fulfilling international obligations, including non-proliferation obligations, while remaining subject to proportionality and due process. The exercise of discretion must also rest on factual findings concerning technology origin, controlled content, and affiliations among relevant entities. In practice, inadequate means of overseas verification, unclear criteria for factual determinations, and limited enforcement resources impede fact-finding and increase the burdens of licensing review and business compliance. Refining this framework therefore requires preserving necessary administrative discretion while clarifying the conditions for imposing controls and the criteria for risk classification. It also requires an appropriate allocation of investigative responsibilities and obligations to provide supporting documentation between administrative authorities and operators, together with improved mechanisms for exemptions, review, and legal remedies. These measures should ensure that the scope of controls is commensurate with actual risks and enforcement capacity, and that the relevant decisions are subject to appropriate procedural safeguards and ex post review.
覃璐怡.中国出口管制立法中裁量性域外适用的法律依据与实践检视[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2026,33(6):77-87.
复制
